MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Development of a Food Security Management Model for Agricultural Community

2011· article· en· W2163534203 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nongnapas Thiengkamol

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood securityAgricultureVulnerability (computing)BusinessSustainable agricultureFood processingAgricultural productivityProduction (economics)MarketingAgricultural economicsGeographyEconomicsFood scienceComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Considering on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) definition of food security, it is a state that is able to access by all people at all times to have enough food for an active and healthy life. The Food security includes at a minimum: 1) ready availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods, and 2) an assured ability to acquire acceptable foods in the socially acceptable ways including, physical and economic access, at all times, to be the sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet the dietary needs and the food preferences for an active and healthy life. In rural area, there is a tendency of food vulnerability. In Agricultural community, the food security is a condition in which all community residents can obtain a safe, culturally acceptable, nutritionally adequate diet through a sustainable food system that maximizes a community’s self-reliance and a social justice. The purpose of this research was to develop a food security management model for an agricultural community. The population was the people in agricultural area of Mahasarakham Province. The research design with the quantitative research was employed in this study. The questionnaire used as an instrument for the data collection was done as a quantitative approach and the Canonical Correlation was used for the data analysis. The result of quantitative research, the finding revealed the best model of canonical correlation was the model had canonically correlated with .51355 between the set of independent variable of the land fertility, the vegetable production, the meat production, the food sources, and the community participation for the natural resource and the environment conservation and the set of dependent variable of food quality, food quantity, and food safety. Key words : Development; Food Security Management Model; Agricultural Community Resume Considerant l'Organisation pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture (FAO) definition de la securite alimentaire, il est un etat qui est en mesure d'acceder par tous les gens en tout temps d'avoir assez de nourriture pour une vie saine et active. La securite alimentaire comporte au minimum: 1) disponibilite d'aliments nutritionnellement appropries et sans danger, et 2) une capacite assuree pour acquerir des aliments acceptables dans la facon socialement acceptable, y compris, l'acces physique et economique, a tout moment, d'etre le suffisant, aliments surs et nutritifs pour repondre aux besoins alimentaires et les preferences alimentaires pour mener une vie saine et active. En zone rurale, il ya une tendance de la vulnerabilite alimentaire. Dans la communaute agricole, la securite alimentaire est une condition dans laquelle tous les residents de la communaute peut obtenir un coffre-fort, culturellement acceptables, regime nutritionnel adequat grâce a un systeme alimentaire durable qui maximise une communaute d'autonomie et d'une justice sociale. Le but de cette recherche etait de developper un modele de gestion de la securite alimentaire d'une communaute agricole. La population etait le peuple de la superficie agricole de la province Mahasarakham. La conception de la recherche avec la recherche quantitative a ete utilisee dans cette etude. Le questionnaire utilise comme un instrument pour la collecte des donnees a ete effectuee dans une approche quantitative et la correlation canonique a ete utilise pour l'analyse des donnees. Le resultat de la recherche quantitative, la recherche revele le meilleur modele de correlation canonique a ete le modele avait canoniquement en correlation avec 0,51355 entre l'ensemble des variables independantes de la fertilite des terres, la production vegetale, la production de viande, les sources de nourriture, et la communaute participation pour les ressources naturelles et la conservation de l'environnement et l'ensemble des variables dependantes de securite de qualite des aliments, la quantite de nourriture, et la nourriture. Mots cles : Developpement; Modele de gestion de la securite alimentaire; Agricole; Communaute

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.346
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations→French-language works237,207→