HEIGHTENED CD40 LIGAND GENE EXPRESSION IN PERIPHERAL CD4+ T CELLS FROM PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT REJECTION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD40 ligand (CD40L) gene expression is increased in rejecting allograft biopsies. We, therefore, tested the possibility that CD40L gene expression is heightened in peripheral CD4+ T cells during renal allograft rejection. METHODS: CD40L gene expression in peripheral blood CD4+ T cells from two renal transplant groups was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Group 1: 20 patients with excellent renal transplant function; group 2: 25 patients with findings of acute and/or chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN); and group 3 of 12 normal controls. CD4+ cells were isolated by positive selection. The modifying effect of cyclosporine (CsA) and FK506 on CD40L gene expression was further tested in vitro in CD4+ T lymphocytes separated from pokeweed mitogen- (PWM) activated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) preparations. RESULTS: Mean+/-SD expressions of CD40L gene, in aM, in groups 1-3 were as follows: 0.0052+/-0.0094; 0.022+/-0.023 (P=0.0038 vs. group 2); and 0.014+/-0.005. Levels of CD40L gene expression correlated significantly with acute rejection Banff 97 score (R2=0.44, P=0.0004) and severity of intertubular capillary changes (ITCC) (R2=0.33, P=0.011). After in vitro activation, CD40L gene expression increased by approximately 4-fold and the addition of CsA or FK506 diminished CD40L gene expression to a base level. CONCLUSION: Peripheral CD4+ T cell CD40L gene expression increases significantly in acute rejection and CAN and may serve as a non-invasive method to monitor allograft function and determine the biological response to CsA and FK506.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".