MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163562767 · doi:10.1139/v09-060

Localized-orbital locator (LOL) profiles of transition-metal hydride and dihydrogen complexes<sup>,</sup>

2009· article· en· W2163562767 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heiko Jacobsen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPennsylvania State University
KeywordsDihydrogen complexChemistryHydrideCrystallographyMoleculeLigand (biochemistry)Transition metalMetalComputational chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bond descriptor based on the kinetic-energy density, the localized-orbital locator (LOL), is used to characterize the nature of the chemical bond in transition-metal hydride and dihydrogen complexes. Cationic complexes of the iron triad [MH 3 (PMe 3 ) 4 ] + (M = Fe, Ru, Os) serve as model compounds for transition-metal hydrogen bonding, since these complexes not only present examples for hydride as well as dihydrogen complexes, but for certain representatives, the two different types of metal–hydrogen bonds are realized within the same molecule. Both types of ligands show characteristic LOL profiles: (3,–3) Γ attractors in close vicinity to the H-atom for hydride ligands, and (3,–3) Γ attractors located between the two atoms for a dihydrogen ligand with ν Γ -values of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. In-between structures combine elements of the hydride and dihydrogen ligands. Relativistic effects on the relative stability of various isomers for the set of model compounds have been evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207