MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163568039 · doi:10.2138/am-2015-5092

Yusupovite, Na <sub>2</sub> Zr(Si <sub>6</sub> O <sub>15</sub> )(H <sub>2</sub> O) <sub>3</sub> , a new mineral species from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif and its implications as a new microporous filter for large ions

2015· article· en· W2163568039 on OpenAlexaff
Atali A. Agakhanov, Leonid A. Pautov, Vladimir Yu. Karpenko, Elena Sokolova, Y. A. Abdu, F. C. Hawthorne, Igor V. Pekov, Oleg I. Siidra

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessAegirineMicroclineCrystallographyElectron microprobeMonoclinic crystal systemMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceMineralPleochroismAlbiteQuartzFluoriteChemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yusupovite, ideally Na 2 Zr(Si 6 O 15 )(H 2 O) 3 , is a new silicate mineral from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif in the upper reaches of the Darai-Pioz river, area of the joint Turkestansky, Zeravshansky, and Alaisky ridges, Tajikistan. Yusupovite was found in a pegmatite composed mainly of reedmergnerite, aegirine, microcline, and polylithionite. It occurs as prismatic grains about 2 mm in size embedded in reedmergnerite; associated minerals are quartz, pectolite, zeravshanite, mendeleevite-(Ce), fluorite, leucosphenite, a pyrochlore-group mineral, neptunite, telyushenkoite, moskvinite-(Y), and shibkovite. Yusupovite is colorless, transparent with a white streak, has a vitreous luster, and does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light. Cleavage is perfect on {110}, parting was not observed. Mohs hardness is 5. Yusupovite is brittle with a splintery fracture. The measured and calculated densities are 2.69(2) and 2.713 g/cm 3 , respectively. Yusupovite is optically biaxial (+) with refractive indices (λ = 589 nm) α = 1.563(2), β = 1.565(2), γ = 1.577(2); 2V meas = 42(3)°, 2V calc = 45°, strong dispersion: r > v. Yusupovite is monoclinic, C2/m, a = 14.5975(4), b = 14.1100(4), c = 14.4394(4) Å, β = 90.0399(4)°, V = 2974.1(3) Å 3 . The six strongest reflections in the X‑ray powder diffraction data [d (Å), I, (hkl)] are 7.05, 100, (020); 3.24, 96, (420); 3.10, 69, (241, 2̅41); 5.13, 53, (202, 2̅02); 6.51, 42, (201, 2̅01); 3.17, 34, (042). The chemical composition (electron microprobe) is: Nb 2 O 5 0.39, SiO 2 58.84, ZrO 2 16.55, HfO 2 0.30, FeO 0.01, Y 2 O 3 3.05, Cs 2 O 2.58, K 2 O 0.95, Na 2 O 8.91, H 2 O calc 7.40, total 98.98 wt%, with H 2 O calculated from structure refinement. The empirical formula (based on 17.5 O apfu) is (Na 1.76 K 0.12 Cs 0.11 ) ∑1.99 (Zr 0.82 Y 0.17 Nb 0.02 Hf 0.01 ) ∑1.02 (Si 6.01 O 14.98 )(H 2 O) 2.52 , Z = 8. The crystal structure of yusupovite was refined to R1 = 3.46% based on 4428 observed reflections. In the crystal structure, there are six Si sites occupied by Si, two M sites occupied mainly by Zr with minor Y and Hf. Si tetrahedra form an epididymite Si 6 O 15 ribbon along [010]. Epididymite ribbons and Zr-dominant M octahedra share common vertices to form a heteropolyhedral Si-Zr-O framework. There are six interstitial sites partly occupied by alkali cations Na, K, and Cs. The three [7]-coordinated Na sites are occupied by Na at 95, 84, and 78%. The three A sites are occupied by K and Cs at 12, 18, and 16%. There are 10 W sites occupied by H 2 O groups at 18-84%. Due to (K,Cs), Na and H 2 O disorder, the symmetry of yusupovite decreases from orthorhombic, space group Pbcm (elpidite), to monoclinic, space group C2/m, and the b unit-cell parameter of yusupovite is doubled compared to the corresponding cell parameter in elpidite, b yus = 2a elp . Yusupovite, ideally Na 2 Zr(Si 6 O 15 )(H 2 O) 3 , is a dimorph of elpidite, Na 2 Zr(Si 6 O 15 )(H 2 O) 3 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicChemical Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207