MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163568039 · doi:10.2138/am-2015-5092

Yusupovite, Na <sub>2</sub> Zr(Si <sub>6</sub> O <sub>15</sub> )(H <sub>2</sub> O) <sub>3</sub> , a new mineral species from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif and its implications as a new microporous filter for large ions

2015· article· en· W2163568039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessAegirineMicroclineCrystallographyElectron microprobeMonoclinic crystal systemMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceMineralPleochroismAlbiteQuartzFluoriteChemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yusupovite, ideally Na2Zr(Si6O15)(H2O)3, is a new silicate mineral from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif in the upper reaches of the Darai-Pioz river, area of the joint Turkestansky, Zeravshansky, and Alaisky ridges, Tajikistan. Yusupovite was found in a pegmatite composed mainly of reedmergnerite, aegirine, microcline, and polylithionite. It occurs as prismatic grains about 2 mm in size embedded in reedmergnerite; associated minerals are quartz, pectolite, zeravshanite, mendeleevite-(Ce), fluorite, leucosphenite, a pyrochlore-group mineral, neptunite, telyushenkoite, moskvinite-(Y), and shibkovite. Yusupovite is colorless, transparent with a white streak, has a vitreous luster, and does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light. Cleavage is perfect on {110}, parting was not observed. Mohs hardness is 5. Yusupovite is brittle with a splintery fracture. The measured and calculated densities are 2.69(2) and 2.713 g/cm3, respectively. Yusupovite is optically biaxial (+) with refractive indices (λ = 589 nm) α = 1.563(2), β = 1.565(2), γ = 1.577(2); 2Vmeas = 42(3)°, 2Vcalc = 45°, strong dispersion: r > v. Yusupovite is monoclinic, C2/m, a = 14.5975(4), b = 14.1100(4), c = 14.4394(4) Å, β = 90.0399(4)°, V = 2974.1(3) Å3. The six strongest reflections in the X‑ray powder diffraction data [d (Å), I, (hkl)] are 7.05, 100, (020); 3.24, 96, (420); 3.10, 69, (241, 2̅41); 5.13, 53, (202, 2̅02); 6.51, 42, (201, 2̅01); 3.17, 34, (042). The chemical composition (electron microprobe) is: Nb2O5 0.39, SiO2 58.84, ZrO2 16.55, HfO2 0.30, FeO 0.01, Y2O3 3.05, Cs2O 2.58, K2O 0.95, Na2O 8.91, H2Ocalc 7.40, total 98.98 wt%, with H2O calculated from structure refinement. The empirical formula (based on 17.5 O apfu) is (Na1.76K0.12Cs0.11)∑1.99 (Zr0.82Y0.17Nb0.02Hf0.01)∑1.02(Si6.01O14.98)(H2O)2.52, Z = 8. The crystal structure of yusupovite was refined to R1 = 3.46% based on 4428 observed reflections. In the crystal structure, there are six Si sites occupied by Si, two M sites occupied mainly by Zr with minor Y and Hf. Si tetrahedra form an epididymite Si6O15 ribbon along [010]. Epididymite ribbons and Zr-dominant M octahedra share common vertices to form a heteropolyhedral Si-Zr-O framework. There are six interstitial sites partly occupied by alkali cations Na, K, and Cs. The three [7]-coordinated Na sites are occupied by Na at 95, 84, and 78%. The three A sites are occupied by K and Cs at 12, 18, and 16%. There are 10 W sites occupied by H2O groups at 18-84%. Due to (K,Cs), Na and H2O disorder, the symmetry of yusupovite decreases from orthorhombic, space group Pbcm (elpidite), to monoclinic, space group C2/m, and the b unit-cell parameter of yusupovite is doubled compared to the corresponding cell parameter in elpidite, byus = 2aelp. Yusupovite, ideally Na2Zr(Si6O15)(H2O)3, is a dimorph of elpidite, Na2Zr(Si6O15)(H2O)3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it