THE EFFECT OF SHIFT WORK ON CORTISOL PRODUCTION IN FEMALE HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES: STUDY IN PROGRESS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is currently the leading cause of death worldwide, contributing to 30% of all deaths. CVD etiology is complex, with many modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Epidemiological evidence generally supports an association between shiftwork and an increased risk for CVD. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Limited research suggests that the production of cortisol may differ between shift workers and non-shift workers, resulting in physiological changes that potentially increase the risk of CVD among shift workers. This study will focus on females who comprise the largest proportion of workers in healthcare settings. Objectives 1) To describe and compare total cortisol levels and its diurnal pattern in relation to current shiftwork status, and cumulative duration of exposure to shiftwork. 2) To determine if current shiftwork status and/or cumulative duration are associated with total cortisol levels, and diurnal pattern. Study design and methods Female participants were recruited from a tertiary acute care teaching hospital in southeastern Ontario, Canada between September 2011 and February 2014 (n=330). An interview and a questionnaire were used to ascertain shiftwork exposure, and covariate information. Urine samples were provided at every void over a 48-hour period to approximate free cortisol levels. A multivariate regression model will be used to describe, and determine the significance of the effect of shiftwork on total cortisol and its diurnal pattern. Hypotheses We anticipate that the overall production of cortisol will be higher in current shift workers than non-shift workers. Cumulative duration of shiftwork exposure will be associated with higher total cortisol levels and with cortisol patterns in a dose-dependent manner. Relevance Shift work is a highly prevalent work pattern: approximately 30% of Canadians are employed in shift work positions. Determining the mechanisms through which shiftwork may influence CVD has the potential to inform interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".