Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, many researchers started to question a long-standing paradox in the engineering practice of digital photography: oversampling followed by compression, and pursue more intelligent sparse sampling techniques. In this research we take a practical approach of uniform down sampling in image space, and the sampling is made adaptive by a spatially varying directional low-pass prefiltering. Since the down-sampled prefiltered image is a low-resolution image of conventional square sample grid, it can be compressed and transmitted without any change to current image coding standards and systems. The decoder first decompresses the low-resolution image and then upsamples it to the original resolution by least-square estimation using a 2D piecewise autoregressive model and the knowledge of directional low-pass filter. The proposed joint adaptive down-sampling and up-sampling technique outperforms JPEG 2000 (the state-of-the-art in lossy image coding) in PSNR measure at low to modest bit rates and achieves superior visual quality at all bit rates. This work shows that oversampling not only increases cost and energy consumption, but it could, even when coupled with a sophisticated rate-distortion optimized compression scheme, cause inferior image quality at certain bit rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".