Absence of Reproductive Consequences of Hybridization in the Northern Flicker (<i>Colaptes auratus</i>) Hybrid Zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two subspecies of Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus), Yellow-shafted Flicker (C. a. auratus) and Red-shafted Flicker (C. a. cafer), form a hybrid zone that stretches the length of North America and is apparently stable. The most widely accepted hypothesis for the zone, the “bounded-hybrid superiority” hypothesis, predicts that the fitness of hybrids should be equal to or higher than that of parental types within the hybrid zone. We compared the reproductive performance at various stages of the reproductive cycle among Northern Flickers of different phenotypes at a location in the hybrid zone in which individuals are predominantly reddish. Individuals with red and yellow coloring showed similar levels of aggression toward taxidermy models of pure Red-shafted and Yellow-shafted flickers, and there was no association between phenotype (color class) and the likelihood of winning agonistic contests. In addition, the color of the male and female parents was not related to nest initiation date, clutch size, hatching success, risk of predation, or number of fledglings. These results do not support the tension-zone model, which predicts lower fitness of hybrids, but neither do they strongly support the concept of hybrid superiority, because all phenotypes had equivalent reproductive success. Annual changes in selection pressure, such as those caused by weather, could mask fitness differences between red and yellow individuals measured at a single geographic location and result in a hybrid zone that is variable in location and width over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".