L'effet des politiques sociales sur l'emploi des nouveaux immigrants à Montréal : une analyse longitudinale et conjoncturelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question de l'insertion sur le march du travail des immigrants est aujourd'hui devenue essentielle.Les dispositifs mis en place au Canada cherchent favoriser la rarticulation entre immigration, march du travail, protection sociale, formation et cohsion sociale.Cet article tudie l'insertion des immigrs sur le march du travail qubcois quatre points de leur parcours : aprs 1, 2, 3 et 10 ans de sjour.Outre les caractristiques individuelles, nous portons une attention particulire l'impact de l'environnement macroconomique et des politiques sociales de redistribution sur la probabilit de sortie d'un pisode de non-emploi de ces immigrants.Nos rsultats montrent que les immigrs forment un groupe htrogne du point de vue de leurs caractristiques individuelles et de leur employabilit.Certains restent marginaliss sur le march du travail.C'est le cas notamment des femmes, des migrants gs et dans un premier temps des moins qualifis.L'assurance chmage et les prestations sociales jouent ngativement sur la sortie de l'pisode de nonemploi.Le taux de chmage local exerce un effet significativement ngatif sur la probabilit d'avoir un emploi et touche essentiellement l'emploi des immigrants peu qualifis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".