Effects of thrice-weekly in-center nocturnal vs. conventional hemodialysis on integrated backscatter of myocardial tissue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasonic tissue characterization with integrated backscatter (IBS) offers a promising method for the noninvasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis and contractile performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of thrice-weekly in-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) and conventional hemodialysis (CHD) on myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular function in end-stage renal disease patients. Thirty-two INHD and 58 matched CHD patients were enrolled; baseline and 12-month measures of blood pressure (BP), serum calcium and phosphorus, echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular function, the myocardial calibrated IBS (C-IBS), and systodiastolic cyclical variations in IBS (CV-IBS) were collected. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except that serum phosphorus and calcium × phosphorus were higher in the INHD group. At 12-month follow-up, there was a significant decrease in the mean C-IBS (-20.2 ± 3.7 to -28.1 ± 4.0 dB, P<0.01) and a significant increase in CV-IBS (5.0 ± 1.5 to 7.1 ± 1.6 dB, P<0.01) in INHD patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the mean C-IBS was positively related to SBP, DBP, LVMI, serum phosphorus, and left atrial volume index and inversely related to midwall fractional shortening, transmitral E/A ratio, and E(m) . The mean CV-IBS was positively correlated with left ventricular midwall fractional shortening, E/A ratio, E(m) and inversely correlated with SBP, DBP, LVMI, serum phosphorus, E/E(m) , and left atrial volume index. There was no significant change in the mean C-IBS, mean CV-IBS, and LVMI in the CHD group. Compared with CHD, INHD improves myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular function, and control of serum phosphorus is associated with the improvement of myocardial fibrosis. Improvement of myocardial fibrosis contributes to the reduction of left ventricle hypertrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".