Body Movement Induced by Electrical Stimulation of Toe Muscles During Standing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether artificially induced muscle contractions of toe muscles using functional electrical stimulation (FES) would cause center of pressure (COP) displacement and corresponding body acceleration. Ten able-bodied subjects were asked to stand still on force plates. The flexor digitorum brevis and the flexor hallucis brevis in both legs were simultaneously stimulated using a transcutaneous FES device. The muscles were stimulated 20 times at random intervals with four different stimulation intensities. We demonstrated that the toe muscle activity induced by electrical stimulation evoked COP displacement, which generated body acceleration. As expected, a larger stimulation induced a larger COP movement and acceleration. Therefore, we propose the use of FES-induced contractions of the toe muscles as a means to control balance during FES-assisted quiet standing. Spinal cord-injured and severe-stroke patients could benefit from this electrical stimulation technique for improving FES-assisted standing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it