MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163922475 · doi:10.2217/14796694.5.1.85

Subcellular Dynamics of The VHL Tumor Suppressor: On The Move for HIF Degradation

2009· review· en· W2163922475 on OpenAlexaff
Mireille Khacho, Stephen Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Oncology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuppressorMedicineDynamics (music)Cancer researchDegradation (telecommunications)Cell biologyInternal medicineCancerBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor protein, the recognition component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, recruits the alpha-subunit of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIFalpha) for oxygen-dependent degradation. The ability of VHL to mediate efficient degradation of HIFalpha is also dependent on its oxygen/pH-regulated subcellular trafficking. Under aerobic conditions, VHL engages in nuclear-cytoplasmic trafficking that requires ongoing transcription and is mediated by a novel nuclear export motif, the transcription-dependent nuclear export motif (TD-NEM). Disease-causing mutations targeting TD-NEM restrain VHL from mediating efficient oxygen-dependent degradation of HIFalpha by altering its subcellular dynamics. In addition, decreasing the extracellular pH, during anaerobic metabolism, stabilizes HIFalpha by triggering the relocalization and static detention of VHL to nucleoli. Together, these recent findings support the critical role of subcellular trafficking and dynamic properties for the function of VHL in promoting HIF regulation and tumor suppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture OncologySame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207