Molecular Genetic Analysis of an <i>SNF2</i> / <i>brahma</i> -Related Gene in <i>Tetrahymena thermophila</i> Suggests Roles in Growth and Nuclear Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used a reverse genetic approach to identify three members of the SNF2 superfamily of chromatin remodeling genes in the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila in order to investigate possible functions of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors in growth and nuclear development. Comparative sequence analysis of the gene product of the Tetrahymena brahma-related gene (TtBRG1) indicates it is a member of the SNF2/BRM subgroup of the SNF2 superfamily. Northern analysis suggests that TtBRG1 has roles in growth and nuclear development in Tetrahymena. Indirect immunofluorescence analysis during nuclear development indicates that TtBrg1p localizes to both the parental and developing macronucleus of Tetrahymena during the time period corresponding to genome rearrangements. We generated germ line knockout heterokaryons for TtBRG1 and demonstrated that expression of the gene is required to complete nuclear development of Tetrahymena. In addition, the formation of distinct Pdd1p-containing structures is disturbed during the late stages of conjugation in TtBRG1 germ line knockout heterokaryons. We discuss these results in light of possible roles of SNF2-related proteins in growth and nuclear development of Tetrahymena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".