MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163973321 · doi:10.1002/app.12373

Synthesis and photoluminescent properties of poly(aryl ether)s containing alternate emitting and electron‐transporting moieties

2003· article· en· W2163973321 on OpenAlexaff
Shuanjin Wang, S. C. Tjong, Yun Meng, Man‐Keung Fung, S. T. Lee, Allan S. Hay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAryleneEtherCopolymerOxadiazolePolymer chemistryGlass transitionThermal stabilityMoietyNucleophilic substitutionSolubilityArylMaterials scienceChemistryAlkylPhotochemistryPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new diphenylbutadiene‐containing bisphenol was successfully synthesized from benzylideneaniline and 4‐propenylanisole via an anil synthetic method. A series of copoly(arylene ether)s consisting of an alternate isolated blue chromophore (diphenylbutadiene) and an electron‐transporting moiety (1,3,4‐oxadiazole) was synthesized and characterized. High molecular weight copoly(arylene ether)s with an inherent viscosity of >0.5 dL/g were prepared by the nucleophilic displacement reaction of oxadiazole‐activated bis‐fluorocompounds with bisphenols. Introduction of ether linkages into the copolymers led to an enhanced solubility in organic solvents such as N , N ‐dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and N ‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidinone (NMP). The resulting copolymers can be cast into tough and transparent films. The copolymers were amorphous in structure with high glass transition temperatures ranging from 182.29 to 194.50°C. They also exhibited good thermal stability with the maximum decomposition temperatures higher than 500°C in nitrogen. The absorption peaks of these copolymers in thin films varied from 375 to 391 nm, while the photoluminescent peaks varied from 410 to 433 nm. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1645–1651, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207