MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

D<scp>IFFERENT</scp> A<scp>PPROACHES TO</scp> D<scp>EFINE</scp> I<scp>NDIVIDUAL</scp> A<scp>MINO</scp> A<scp>CID</scp> R<scp>EQUIREMENTS</scp>

2003· review· en· W2164108680 on OpenAlexaff
Paul B. Pencharz, Ronald O. Ball

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Nutrition · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmino acidBiochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.008
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations174
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Review of NutritionSame topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207