Effective protection by NHE-1 inhibition in ischemic and reperfused heart under preconditioning blockade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compared the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger-1 (NHE-1) inhibitor cariporide in isolated rat hearts subjected to global ischemia (45 or 90 min) and 30-min reperfusion and determined the protective effects of cariporide under IPC blockade with the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K(+) channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD). With 45-min ischemia, both IPC and cariporide equally increased maximum recovery of left ventricular developed pressure twofold (P < 0.05), although recovery was significantly greater with cariporide for the first 15 min of reperfusion. 5-HD almost completely blocked the protective effects of IPC on recovery but had no influence on the salutary effects of cariporide. With 90-min ischemic control, recovery was only 3% of preischemia and was unaffected by IPC, although cariporide increased recovery to approximately 30% (P < 0.05). This was associated with a 37% preservation of viable cardiac cells, whereas no structurally intact cells were found in either IPC or control hearts. Our study shows that NHE-1 inhibition is a more effective cardioprotective strategy than IPC in this model, possibly because of enhanced myocyte salvage, and because protection by NHE-1 inhibition is completely unaffected by IPC blockade with 5-HD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".