MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164154937 · doi:10.1586/14760584.5.2.269

Immunization strategies for the control of serogroup C meningococcal disease in developed countries

2006· review· en· W2164154937 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe De Wals

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Vaccines · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeningococcal diseaseVaccinationImmunogenicityEpidemiologyImmunizationMedicineMeningococcal vaccineVaccination scheduleImmunologyOutbreakIncidence (geometry)ImmunityDiseaseVirologyPediatricsNeisseria meningitidisAntibodyBiologyImmune systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In developed countries, the epidemiology of serogroup C meningococcal disease is characterized by unpredictable outbreaks and a bimodal distribution of cases, with the highest incidence rate among those below 1 year of age and a second peak in teenagers. Serogroup C meningococcal conjugate vaccines elicit a thymus-dependent immunological response that is already present in young infants and is characterized by the production of protective antibodies and the development of memory. Results from immunogenicity and effectiveness studies indicate that waning of immunity occurs over time, and the protection conferred by vaccination before 1 year of age seems to be shortlived. Very different control strategies have been implemented throughout the world and existing vaccination schedules may not be optimal. A schedule consisting of a first dose around 1 year of age and a second dose around 12 years of age seems to be a very cost-effective option in most epidemiological scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of VaccinesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207