Lithospheric variations across the Superior Province, Ontario, Canada: Evidence from tomography and shear wave splitting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Superior Province of the Canadian Shield is the largest contiguous region of the Archean crust. A combination of data from multiple experiments is used to obtain shear wave splitting parameters and a three‐dimensional tomographic velocity model beneath a large portion of the Superior, corresponding approximately to the province of Ontario. Shear wave splits are obtained at 24 sites across the Superior, displaying strong (averaging 1.34 s) ENE‐WSW splitting at stations west of 86°W and weaker (0.67 s) E‐W splitting in the east. The fast direction is subparallel to both absolute plate motion and tectonic belt boundaries. The recovered tomographic velocity model shows a major boundary oriented NNW‐SSE, separating high velocities in the western Superior (WS) from low velocities in the east and coinciding with the divide between weak and strong shear wave splits. Other features include a 200‐km‐thick low‐velocity anomaly corresponding to the Nipigon Embayment, a 1.0‐Ga failed‐rift branch; and a linear low‐velocity anomaly in the east, attributed to the Great Meteor hot spot track. The Nipigon anomaly, in the western portion of the model, is probably in situ, while the Great Meteor track is displaced from crustal features associated with the hot spot. We interpret this displacement as evidence that the eastern lithosphere has been deformed by basal drag, while the western lithosphere has remained stable, and propose that the east‐west lithospheric boundary we have detected represents a change in mechanical properties, between stronger, higher velocity western material with consistent anisotropic fabric, and weaker eastern material with more variable fabric.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".