MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164207654 · doi:10.1029/2006jb004861

Lithospheric variations across the Superior Province, Ontario, Canada: Evidence from tomography and shear wave splitting

2007· article· en· W2164207654 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. W. Frederiksen, S. Miong, F. A. Darbyshire, David W. Eaton, S. Rondenay, S. Sol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryWestern UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLithosphereGeologyShear wave splittingSeismologyCrustShear (geology)RiftSeismic tomographyTectonicsShear zoneShear velocityGeophysicsGeodesyMantle (geology)PetrologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Superior Province of the Canadian Shield is the largest contiguous region of the Archean crust. A combination of data from multiple experiments is used to obtain shear wave splitting parameters and a three‐dimensional tomographic velocity model beneath a large portion of the Superior, corresponding approximately to the province of Ontario. Shear wave splits are obtained at 24 sites across the Superior, displaying strong (averaging 1.34 s) ENE‐WSW splitting at stations west of 86°W and weaker (0.67 s) E‐W splitting in the east. The fast direction is subparallel to both absolute plate motion and tectonic belt boundaries. The recovered tomographic velocity model shows a major boundary oriented NNW‐SSE, separating high velocities in the western Superior (WS) from low velocities in the east and coinciding with the divide between weak and strong shear wave splits. Other features include a 200‐km‐thick low‐velocity anomaly corresponding to the Nipigon Embayment, a 1.0‐Ga failed‐rift branch; and a linear low‐velocity anomaly in the east, attributed to the Great Meteor hot spot track. The Nipigon anomaly, in the western portion of the model, is probably in situ, while the Great Meteor track is displaced from crustal features associated with the hot spot. We interpret this displacement as evidence that the eastern lithosphere has been deformed by basal drag, while the western lithosphere has remained stable, and propose that the east‐west lithospheric boundary we have detected represents a change in mechanical properties, between stronger, higher velocity western material with consistent anisotropic fabric, and weaker eastern material with more variable fabric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207