Intermediate Outcomes of Fresh Talar Osteochondral Allografts for Treatment of Large Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Large osteochondral defects of the talus present a treatment challenge. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation can be used for large lesions without the donor-site morbidity associated with other procedures such as autologous chondrocyte implantation or osteochondral autograft transfer. The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the intermediate outcomes of fresh osteochondral allografting for osteochondral lesions of the talus with use of validated outcome measures. METHODS: Sixteen patients (seventeen ankles) received a fresh osteochondral allograft, and all sixteen were available for follow-up. Data were prospectively collected with use of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Module outcome measures. Postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale scores were also collected. All sixteen patients underwent radiographic and computed tomographic (CT) analyses preoperatively, and fifteen patients had these studies postoperatively. RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up was 4.1 years. The latest follow-up CT evaluation identified failure of graft incorporation in two of sixteen ankles. Osteolysis, subchondral cysts, and degenerative changes were found in five, eight, and seven ankles, respectively. Five ankles were considered failures, and two required a reoperation because of ongoing symptoms. The AOS Disability and the AAOS Foot and Ankle Core Scale scores significantly improved, but there was no significant change in the AOS Pain, AAOS Foot and Ankle Shoe Comfort Scale, or SF-36 scores. Overall, ten patients had a good or excellent result; however, persistent symptoms remained in six of these patients. Only four were symptom-free. CONCLUSION: The use of a fresh osteochondral allograft is a reasonable option for the treatment of large talar osteochondral lesions. The high reoperation rate (two of seventeen) and failure rate (five of seventeen) must be taken into consideration when one is choosing this procedure for the management of these lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it