Attracting states in frontal cortex networks associated with working memory and decision making
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A frequent hypothesis in theoretical neuroscience is that cognitive entities are represented and processed by attracting states of the underlying neural system [1]. For instance, different attractor-like states may represent different spatial locations or cognitive entities, and transitions between these attracting sets could be associated with the recall of a memory sequence or the execution of a motor plan. Attractor states underlying cognition were previously proposed in the context of working memory [1] and decision making tasks. However, although theoretically suggested, experimental evidence is still sparse for the hypothesis that higher cognitive processes proceed by moving between attracting states in higher cortical areas. Using state space reconstruction theorems [3] and statistical learning techniques, we were able to reveal dynamical properties, not easily accessible in previous studies, of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) multiple single-unit activity (MSUA) during a cognitive task. The approach worked by constructing high-dimensional state spaces from delays of the original single-unit instantaneous firing-rates and all possible products (multinomials) among them up to some specific order. The dynamics within these sparse and high-dimensional spaces of neural activity interactions were then statistically accessed using strongly regularized kernel methods [4,5]. Results showed cognitive-epoch-specific neural ensemble states (dependent on behavioral performance [3]) in ACC while the rats performed an ecologically valid eight-arm radial arm-maze task. More interestingly, these cognitively defined ensemble states showed some hallmarks of attracting behavior which became apparent in high-dimensional expansions of the MSU spaces due to a proper unfolding of the neural activity flow. It turned out that optimal unfolding of neural trajectories was achieved in an embedding space characterized by a specific maximum order of neural interactions, common across different animals. In further analyses, ensemble states as a function of the animal’s spatial position i.e. the arm visited were analyzed. From these analyses the intrinsic dimensionality which is relevant to the animal’s arm choices could be computed [4]. Results showed that cognitively relevant network states were restricted to a low-dimensional nonlinear manifold within the high-dimensional space. Finally, preliminary analyses indicate that it might be possible to directly infer from this reduced space an idealized neural ensemble model with predictive properties across future trials with respect to the animal’s arm choices. An analysis of such a model would permit a full characterization of the putative neural attractors underlying working memory. To summarize, results suggest that ACC networks may process different subcomponents of higher cognitive tasks by transitioning between different attracting states. Moreover it may be possible to use these analyses to characterize the dynamical states underlying the animal’s choices without further assumptions about the biophysical variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".