MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164238593 · doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.093344

Atrioventricular septal defect: from fetus to adult

2006· review· en· W2164238593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrioventricular Septal DefectDown syndromeHeart diseaseCardiologyPopulationInternal medicineTrisomyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term “atrioventricular septal defect” (AVSD) covers a spectrum of congenital heart malformations characterised by a common atrioventricular junction coexisting with deficient atrioventricular septation. In ostium primum atrial septal defect (ASD) there are separate atrioventricular valvar orifices despite a common junction, while in complete AVSD the valve itself is also shared. The estimated incidence of the condition in the era of two-dimensional echocardiography varies from 0.24/1000w1 live births to 0.31/1000w2 live births. There is a strong association with Down’s syndrome, with half of patients with AVSD in the population of Bohemia also complicated by Down’s syndrome.w3 Conversely in a Toronto study about one third of patients with Down’s syndrome had a complete AVSD and 5% had an ostium primum ASD.w4 In a prospective screening study within the relatively static Northern Irish population the incidence of AVSD in Down’s syndrome was 17% and the overall incidence of congenital heart disease in Down’s syndrome was 42%.1 Three different genetic patterns are described in AVSD: the association with Down’s syndrome, as an autosomal dominant trait, and isolated. Molecular studies of patients with congenital heart disease and partial duplications of chromosome 21 have proposed DSCAM (Down’s syndrome cell adhesion molecule) as a candidate gene causing congenital heart disease in Down’s syndrome.2 Cases with autosomal dominant inheritance, however, are not linked to chromosome 21.w5 Over the past four decades the management of the complete form of the condition has evolved from palliative pulmonary artery banding in infancy with later repair to primary repair in early infancy to prevent the development of pulmonary vascular obstructive disease. Decreasing operative mortality has significantly altered the prognosis of these patients with and without Down’s syndrome. The improved prognosis for patients with Down’s syndrome and AVSD has implications for the management of patients …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it