CHOTTO1, a Double AP2 Domain Protein of Arabidopsis thaliana, Regulates Germination and Seedling Growth Under Excess Supply of Glucose and Nitrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arabidopsis chotto1 (cho1) mutants show resistance to (-)-R-ABA, an ABA analog, during germination and seedling growth. Here, we report cloning and characterization of the CHO1 gene. cho1 mutants showed only subtle resistance to (+)-S-ABA during germination. The cho1 mutation acts as a strong enhancer of the abi5 mutant, whereas the cho1 abi4 double mutant showed ABA resistance similar to the abi4 single mutant. This suggests that CHO1 and ABI4, but not ABI5, act in the same genetic pathway. Map-based cloning revealed that the CHO1 gene encodes a putative transcription factor containing double AP2 domains. The CHO1 gene was expressed predominantly in seed, with the strongest expression in imbibed seed. Induction of CHO1 expression was observed 4 h after seed imbibition and reached a maximum level at 24 h. Induction of CHO1 expression did not occur in the abi4 mutants, indicating that this is an ABI4-dependent process. Microarray experiments showed that a large number of genes involved in primary metabolism and the stress response were up-regulated in the cho1 mutant. Growth of abi4 and cho1 mutant seedlings was resistant to high concentrations of glucose. In addition, growth of cho1 mutant seedlings was partially resistant to excess nitrate (50 mM), as evident from their expanded green cotyledons. However, their growth was normal under moderate nitrate concentrations (< 10 mM). This nitrate response was specific to the cho1 mutants and was not observed in the abi4 mutants. Taken together, our results indicate that CHO1 regulates nutritional responses downstream of ABI4 during germination and seedling growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".