Genetic Deficiency in Complement Component 4b Does Not Alter Radiation-Induced Lung Disease in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous investigations have shown altered levels of complement components to be associated with radiation-induced lung disease. In this study we aimed to determine whether a deficiency in complement component 4b alters the lung response to irradiation of C57BL/6 mice. The pulmonary phenotype of C57BL/6 C4b(-/-) mice and their wild-type littermates was assessed following an 18 Gy single dose to the thoracic cavity. The assessed end points included, survival time postirradiation, bronchoalveolar lavage cell differential, hydroxyproline measures and histological evidence of alveolitis and fibrosis. The lung phenotype of C4b-deficient mice did not differ from that of wild-type mice in terms of survival time postirradiation, tissue hydroxyproline levels or by histological evidence of alveolitis or fibrosis. No differences in bronchoalveolar cell differential counts were evident among the irradiated mice grouped by C4b genotype. We concluded that a deficiency in C4b does not alter radiation-induced lung disease in the C57BL/6 mouse model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".