In vitro flexibility of an experimental pedicle screw and plate instrumentation system on the porcine lumbar spine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The positive correlation between spinal construct stiffness and fusion rate has led to the use of increasingly rigid surgical spinal instrumentation systems. Unfortunately, however, these rigid systems have also been correlated with sub-optimal fusion quality measures. To date, in vivo studies to explore these relationships have involved the use of different implants and surgical procedures to influence the biomechanical environment at the fusion site. In order to avoid these confounding variables, a novel experimental instrumentation system has been developed which is capable of independently controlling spinal construct flexibility (inverse of stiffness). In the present study, this experimental pedicle screw and plate system was subjected to rigorous pure moment flexibility testing in flexion-extension and lateral bending using an in vitro porcine lumbar spine model. Analysis of the data showed that the system provided a reproducible, stepwise-modulated spinal construct flexibility as measured by neutral zone flexibility, laxity angle and range of motion parameters. Differences in flexibility were most evident using the neutral zone parameters (neutral zone flexibility and laxity angle). This is of particular interest given that the clinical instability of a spinal segment may be related to its behaviour within the neutral zone. This information will ultimately guide the design of improved human spinal instrumentation systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".