Psychophysiological Response Patterns of High and Low Alexithymics Under Mental and Emotional Load Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Compared to normals or low alexithymics, high alexithymic subjects show a modified psychophysiological reactivity under experimental stress. This study aims to differentiate these effects under different load conditions (mental vs. emotional load, 5min each). High (N = 33) and low (N = 33) alexithymic subjects were identified by the German version of the Toronto-Alexithymia-Scale (TAS-20). Subjects were exposed to two tasks of the continuous performance test as a mental load condition and two unpleasant movie sequences as an emotional load condition. Heart rate and electrodermal activity (nonspecific skin conductance reactions) were continuously recorded during stimuli presentation. High alexithymic subjects showed a decreased number of nonspecific skin conductance reactions under all load conditions compared to low alexithymics. Initial heart rate acceleration of high alexithymic subjects under mental load was stronger, whereas under emotional load high alexithymic subjects showed a stronger initial heart rate deceleration. Results are discussed with respect to a modified processing of emotionally qualified information in alexithymics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".