MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Plant biomass and production and CO<sub><b>2</b></sub> exchange in an ombrotrophic bog

2002· article· en· W2164404137 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsOmbrotrophicBogSphagnumBiomass (ecology)PeatBotanyEnvironmental scienceAgronomyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Above‐ground biomass was measured at bog hummock, bog hollow and poor‐fen sites in Mer Bleue, a large, raised ombrotrophic bog near Ottawa, Ont., Canada. The average above‐ground biomass was 587 g m −2 in the bog, composed mainly of shrubs and Sphagnum capitula. In the poor fen, the average biomass was 317 g m −2 , comprising mainly sedges and herbs and Sphagnum capitula. Vascular plant above‐ground biomass was greater where the water table was lower, with a similar but weaker relationship for Sphagnum capitula and vascular leaf biomass. Below‐ground biomass averaged 2400 g m −2 at the bog hummock site, of which 300 g m −2 was fine roots (&lt; 2 mm diameter), compared with 1400 g m −2 in hollows (fine roots 450 g m −2 ) and 1200 g m −2 at the poor‐fen site. Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) of CO 2 was measured in chambers and used to derive ecosystem respiration and photosynthesis. Under high light flux (PAR of 1500 µmol m −2 s −1 ), NEE ranged across sites from 0.08 to 0.22 mg m −2 s −1 (a positive value indicates ecosystem uptake) in the spring and summer, but fell to –0.01 to –0.13 mg m −2 s −1 (i.e. a release of CO 2 ) during a late‐summer dry period. There was a general agreement between a combination of literature estimates of photosynthetic capacity for shrubs and mosses and measured biomass and summer‐time CO 2 uptake determined by the eddy covariance technique within a bog footprint (0.40 and 0.35–0.40 mg m −2 s −1 , respectively). Gross photosynthesis was estimated to be about 530 g m −2 year −1 , total respiration 460 g m −2 year −1 , and export of DOC, DIC and CH 4 10 g m −2 year −1 , leaving an annual C sequestration rate of 60 g m −2 year −1 . Root production and decomposition are important parts of the C budget of the bog. Root C production was estimated to be 161–176 g m −2 year −1 , resulting in fractional turnover rates of 0.2 and 1 year −1 for total and fine roots, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it