MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164419047 · doi:10.1128/jb.185.2.674-678.2003

Experimental Verification of a Sequence-Based Prediction: F <sub>1</sub> F <sub>0</sub> -Type ATPase of <i>Vibrio cholerae</i> Transports Protons, Not Na <sup>+</sup> Ions

2003· article· en· W2164419047 on OpenAlexafffund
Judith Dzioba, Claudia C. Häse, Khoosheh K. Gosink, Michael Y. Galperin, Pavel Dibrov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
KeywordsVibrio choleraeBiologyATPaseVibrioEscherichia coliProtein subunitBacteriaVesicleMutantBiochemistryEnzymeArchaeaMembraneBiophysicsMicrobiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The membrane energetics of the intestinal pathogen Vibrio cholerae involves both H(+) and Na(+) as coupling ions. The sequence of the c subunit of V. cholerae F(0)F(1) ATPase suggested that this enzyme is H(+) specific, in contrast to the results of previous studies on the Na(+)-dependent ATP synthesis in closely related Vibrio spp. Measurements of the pH gradient and membrane potential in membrane vesicles isolated from wild-type and DeltaatpE mutant V. cholerae show that the F(1)F(0) ATPase of V. cholerae is an H(+), not Na(+), pump, confirming the bioinformatics assignments that were based on the Na(+)-binding model of S. Rahlfs and V. Müller (FEBS Lett. 404:269-271, 1999). Application of this model to the AtpE sequences from other bacteria and archaea indicates that Na(+)-specific F(1)F(0) ATPases are present in a number of important bacterial pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207