Magnetic and structural studies on 1,3-diazolate complexes of cobalt(II) The characterization of three new cobalt(II) molecule-based magnets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cobalt(II) compounds ([Co(imid) 2 ] x (1), [Co(2-meimid) 2 ] x (2), [Co(4-meimid) 2 ] x (3), [Co(benzimid) 2 ] x (4), and [Co 3 (imid) 6 (imidH) 2 ] x (5) (imid = imidazolate, 2-meimid = 2-methylimidazolate, 4-meimid = 4-methylimi dazolate, benzimid = benzimidazolate)), have been synthesized and structurally and magnetically characterized. Electronic and vibrational spectroscopy and thermogravimetric studies on all five compounds support structures involving tetrahedrally coordinated cobalt centers with single-bridging 1,3-diazolate ligands forming extended polymeric lattices. Moreover, X-ray powder diffraction studies on 1 and 5 established, through isomorphism with published structures, that the molecular connectivity in these materials is 3-D. Variable temperature and applied field magnetization studies revealed antiferromagnetism as the primary magnetic exchange process in all five compounds. In addition, 1, 4, and 5 show magnetic phase transitions to ferromagnetically ordered states below critical temperatures of 16, 13, and 15 K, respectively. Magnetization measurements at 4.8 K as the applied field was cycled between +55 000 and 55 000 G revealed typical hysteresis behavior and gave remnant magnetizations of 334, 257, and 175 cm 3 G mol 1 and coersive fields of 6620, 5280, and 4140 G for 1, 4, and 5, respectively. No evidence for long-range magnetic order was obtained for either 2 or 3. A comparison of the magnetic properties of three pairs of isostructural iron(II) and cobalt(II) molecule-based magnets shows that while the coersive fields are in general larger for cobalt over iron, the magnitude of the difference varies significantly suggesting that one cannot conclude that cobalt analogues will always be harder magnets.Key words: cobalt(II), 1,3-diazolates, canted spins, molecule-based magnets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".