MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164551875 · doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1403_6

Attitudes Toward Tuberculosis of Final Year Medical Students From Canada, India, and Uganda

2002· article· en· W2164551875 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julie Emili, Fran Scott, Ross Upshur, Mary Lou Schmuck, K. R. John

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching and Learning in Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTuberculosisCurriculumFamily medicinePositive attitudeMedical schoolPediatricsMedical educationPedagogyPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis, although both preventable and treatable, continues to be the world's leading cause of death from an infectious agent. PURPOSE: To extend the results of our previous study of knowledge and practices of final year medical students regarding tuberculosis at three medical schools from endemic and nonendemic areas and to describe their attitudes. METHODS: Eight statements assessing attitudes, as part of a larger survey, were administered to final year medical students at McMaster University in Canada, Christian Medical College in India, and Makerere University in Uganda. RESULTS: One hundred sixty surveys were returned with 155 completed attitude responses. The response rate was 68.4% (65 of 95) for McMaster University, 39.7% (23 of 58) for the Christian Medical College, and 78.3% (72 of 92) for Makerere University. Analysis showed that six of eight attitude items were slightly statistically different among the schools with minimal effect of curriculum time and patient exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite quite varied exposure to tuberculosis, students from endemic and nonendemic areas responded similarly on statements addressing attitudes toward tuberculosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching and Learning in MedicineSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207