Patrimonio Perdido: Tesoros Guatemaltecos en Colecciones Extranjeras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
¿Por qué se encuentra gran parte del patrimonio más emblemático de Latinoamérica fuera de la región? Como tantos otros valiosos documentos, los Libros Segundo y Tercero del Cabildo de Santiago se daban por perdidos, imposibilitando la consulta de fuentes clave sobre los acontecimientos y circunstancias del periodo colonial temprano en Guatemala. Resulta, sin embargo, que estos dos tomos, que cubren los años entre 1530 y 1553, no están desaparecidos sino que forman parte de los fondos de la Hispanic Society of America desde principios del siglo pasado. Se discute cómo esos dos tomos, y otro material documental y arqueológico de incalculable valor, fueron sacados de Guatemala, identificando el siglo XIX y los primeros años del siglo XX como el periodo en que el patrimonio latinoamericano fue más vulnerable a las amenazas (internas y externas) de expolio. Why is so much of Latin America¿s emblematic patrimony not to be found in the region itself? Like many priceless documents, the Libros Segundo y Tercero del Cabildo de Santiago have long been thought to be missing, thereby removing for consultation key sources concerning the events and circumstances of the early colonial period in Guatemala. It turns out that these two tomes, which span the years between 1530 and 1553, are not missing. In fact, they have been part of the holdings of the Hispanic Society of America for the past century. Discussion centers on how these two items, and countless other textual materials and archeological artefacts, were taken from Guatemala or disappeared from circulation altogether, identifying the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as the period during which national patrimony was most under threat from both internal and external forces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".