Denendeh : anthropologists, politics and ethnicity in the reorganization of the Canadian Northwest Territories
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'A. examine les presupposes epistemologiques qui sous-tendent, d'une part, la connaissance et les descriptions anthropologiques des Athapaskan du Nord - ou Dene -, d'autre part, la connaissance et la presentation d'eux-memes des Athapaskan du Nord. Il tente de comprendre comment l'adoption d'ethnonymes anglais contribue a la reification de l'identite des Dene, et comment ceux-ci utilisent les termes anglais d'identification tribale ou nationale dans leurs relations internes et avec les Euro-Canadiens. Il montre d'abord que le savoir cumulatif sur le passe des Athapaskan du Nord, tel qu'il est presente dans le volume six du Handbook of North American Indians (Helm, 1981), est organise a partir de categories theoriques imprecises. Il suggere que l'anthropologie des Dene tend a legitimer et reifier, plutot que d'analyser, les termes ethniques utilises dans le contexte sociopolitique des relations interculturelles de la periode du commerce des fourrures. Il soutient ensuite que les descriptions anthropologiques actuelles du processus de constitution des Dene en tant que Premiere Nation dans un territoire commun - Denendeh -, dans le cadre des revendications territoriales et politiques contemporaines et de la reorganisation des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, sont tout autant imprecises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it