Denendeh : anthropologists, politics and ethnicity in the reorganization of the Canadian Northwest Territories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'A. examine les presupposes epistemologiques qui sous-tendent, d'une part, la connaissance et les descriptions anthropologiques des Athapaskan du Nord - ou Dene -, d'autre part, la connaissance et la presentation d'eux-memes des Athapaskan du Nord. Il tente de comprendre comment l'adoption d'ethnonymes anglais contribue a la reification de l'identite des Dene, et comment ceux-ci utilisent les termes anglais d'identification tribale ou nationale dans leurs relations internes et avec les Euro-Canadiens. Il montre d'abord que le savoir cumulatif sur le passe des Athapaskan du Nord, tel qu'il est presente dans le volume six du Handbook of North American Indians (Helm, 1981), est organise a partir de categories theoriques imprecises. Il suggere que l'anthropologie des Dene tend a legitimer et reifier, plutot que d'analyser, les termes ethniques utilises dans le contexte sociopolitique des relations interculturelles de la periode du commerce des fourrures. Il soutient ensuite que les descriptions anthropologiques actuelles du processus de constitution des Dene en tant que Premiere Nation dans un territoire commun - Denendeh -, dans le cadre des revendications territoriales et politiques contemporaines et de la reorganisation des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, sont tout autant imprecises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".