MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164567077 · doi:10.1139/v01-180

Effect of the molecular weight on the lower critical solution temperature of poly(<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-diethylacrylamide) in aqueous solutions

2001· article· en· W2164567077 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
D. Lessard, M. Ousalem, X. X. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLower critical solution temperatureChemistryDispersityAqueous solutionPolymerMolar massUpper critical solution temperatureEnthalpyTurbidimetryPhase diagramAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsPolymer chemistryPhase (matter)Physical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular weight dependence of the lower critical solution temperature of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) was studied with 11 samples of the polymer with a number-average molecular weight (M n ) ranging from 9.6 × 10 3 to 1.3 × 10 6 g mol –1 and relatively narrow polydispersity indices from 1.19 and 2.60. These samples were obtained by fractional precipitation of the polymer. LCST values of polymers were measured by turbidimetry and microcalorimetry. An inverse dependence of LCST on the molar mass was found and the LCST of the samples remained more or less a constant above a critical molecular weight of ca. 2 × 10 5 g mol –1 . The enthalpy and the entropy changes as well as the LCST of the polymer depend strongly on the molar mass of the polymer, especially in low molecular weight range.Key words: poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide), LCST, thermosensitive, phase diagram, effect of molecular weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsFrench-language works237,207