MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164576175 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3295

The Functional <b> <i>UGT1A1</i> </b> Promoter Polymorphism Decreases Endometrial Cancer Risk

2004· article· en· W2164576175 on OpenAlexafffund
Yannick Duguay, Monica McGrath, Johanie Lépine, Jean-François Gagné, Susan E. Hankinson, Graham A. Colditz, David J. Hunter, Marie Plante, Bernard Têtu, Alain Bélanger, Chantal Guillemette, Immaculata De Vivo

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de QuébecCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsEndometrial cancerOdds ratioGenotypeAlleleInternal medicineConfidence intervalCase-control studyCarcinogenesisMedicineEndocrinologyMetaboliteBiologyGastroenterologyOncologyCancerGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 is involved in the inactivation of estradiol (E(2)) and its oxidized metabolites. These metabolites have been shown to contribute to the development of endometrial cancer in animal studies. Thus UGT1A1 represents a candidate gene in endometrial carcinogenesis. In this study, we established the substrate specificity of UGT1A1 for E(2) and its 2- and 4-hydroxylated metabolites. Intrinsic clearances indicated that UGT1A1 had a preference for the glucuronidation of 2-hydroxyestradiol, a metabolite associated with antiproliferative activity. Expression analysis demonstrated that UGT1A1 is present in the nonmalignant endometrium. Subsequently, we sought to determine whether the common UGT1A1 promoter allele, UGT1A1*28 [A(TA)(7)TAA], which decreases gene transcription, was associated with endometrial cancer risk in a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study (222 cases, 666 matched controls). Conditional logistic regression demonstrated a significant inverse association with the UGT1A1*28 allele and endometrial cancer risk. Compared with women homozygous for the UGT1A1*1 [A(TA)(6)TAA] allele, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-1.16] for the UGT1A1*1/*28 genotype and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21-0.75) for the homozygous UGT1A1*28 genotype (P(trend) = 0.007). There was a suggestion of an interaction by menopausal status [OR = 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18-0.85) for premenopausal women and OR = 0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.13) for postmenopausal women who carry the UGT1A1*28 allele (P(interaction) = 0.05)]. These observations suggest that lower expression of UGT1A1 decreases the risk of endometrial cancer by reducing the excretion of 2-hydroxyestradiol, the antiproliferative metabolite of E(2), in the endometrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.267
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207