Observations on the function of the female urethra: II: Relation between maximum urethral closure pressure at rest and the degree of urethral incompetence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To study the relation between maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) at rest and the degree of urethral incompetence in the female. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty five patients aged 20 years or older, with stable bladders on multichannel urodynamics, without known neurological pathology, and with no previous history of pelvic or anti-incontinence surgery were included in the study. Resting urethral pressure profile (UPP) and the grade of urethral incompetence was registered. RESULTS: Mean age of the group was 45.6+/-12.7 years; mean MUCP was 62.7+/-28.5 cm of water. There was a statistically significant difference in the MUCP when the different grades of urethral incompetence were compared to each other, the higher grades being associated with a lower maximal closure pressure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is a highly significant relationship between MUCP and between all grades of urethral incompetence. This supports previous observations that MUCP decreases when abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) is low and that this might be secondary to some mechanical failure in the pressure transmission from the abdominal cavity to the urethra. Studies should never compare continent to incontinent cohorts without considering their ALPP because in doing so they are comparing groups that are functionally heterogeneous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".