Thermal properties, rheology and sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene and its composites with polyethylene terephthalate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The addition of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) may be a promising approach to achieve improved wear properties in artificial joints. Since UHMWPE/PET composites are processed by compression molding, which involves compaction and sintering of polymeric powders, this article investigates their rheology, thermal properties, and sintering behavior to aid in the identification and selection of optimum processing conditions. Isothermal crystallization kinetics studies have revealed that crystallization of UHMWPE proceeds via heterogeneous nucleation and is governed by two‐dimensional growth. The crystallization rates of the composites were lower than those of the neat material, whereas their ultimate crystallinities were higher. The UHMWPE/PET composites had higher viscosity and elasticity than the neat resin. In the presence of PET fibers the onset of sintering took place at higher temperatures but proceeded at substantially higher rates as compared with pure UHMWPE. A marked discrepancy between the Eshelby‐Frenkel model and experimental sintering data suggests that viscous flow is not the prevailing mechanism for coalescence but rather that enhanced surface area, attributed to the highly developed internal morphology of UHMWPE particles, is the controlling factor. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:678–686, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it