Partial sums of certain classes of analytic functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In Geometric Function Theory, it is well known that the familiar Koebe function f(z) = z/(1 − z)2 is the extremal function for the class 𝒮* of starlike functions in the open unit disk 𝕌 and also that the function g(z) = z/(1 − z) is the extremal function for the class 𝒦 of convex functions in the open unit disk 𝕌. However, the partial sum fn (z) of f(z) is not starlike in 𝕌 and the partial sum gn (z) of g(z) is not convex in 𝕌. The aim of the present paper is to investigate the starlikeness and convexity of these partial sums fn (z) and gn (z). Computational and graphical usages of Mathematica (Version 4.0) as well as geometrical descriptions of the image domains in several illustrative examples are also presented. E-mail: owa@math.kindai.ac.jp Keywords: Analytic functionsUnivalent functionsStarlike functionsConvex functionsAlexander's theoremPartial sumsExtremal functionsLibera integral transformImage domains Acknowledgements The present investigation was supported, in part, by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under Grant OGP0007353. Notes E-mail: owa@math.kindai.ac.jp
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it