Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is a design of a sustainable family farm within the context of drastic changes is rural areas over the past century and the coming changes of the future century. The design explores the integration of farm culture, farm architecture, and farm sustainability. It uses the creative architecture to solve common farm problems. \n \nThe thesis is organized into three major chapters relating to the three major areas of research; architecture precidents, context, and farming approaches, along with a design chapter. \n \nChapter one looks at precedents for the unusual proposition of an architect designing a farm which is usually left to vernacular architecture. The farm design is related to the evolution of the villa ideology using James Ackerman. \n \nChapter two explores the context of agriculture. It maps the historical changes due to industrialization and cheep fossil fuel energy. It continues to map the current beginnings of change due to rising energy costs and environmental concerns. These issues are expressed in the local conditions of the 150 acre site in Middlesex County, Southern Ontario. It places the thesis within contemporary issues of sustainability. \n \nChapter three explains the design of the Woven Lea Farm. It describes the architecture of the farm as a total ecosystem design. The woven Lea Farm gets its name from the many complexities woven together and the pasture or lea rotation system which is an essential part of the design. \n \nChapter four explores agriculture approaches and resulting technologies. It is a critique of artisanal, industrial, certified organic, and organic practices. This chapter explains the design as a hybridization of all these theories and explains many of the processes involved in the Woven Lea Farm. \n \nThe design presents the agriculture environment and a critique of available practices. The design is a holistic approach including energy cycles, animal and landscape management, and passive building systems. This thesis is not only a design solution but can be used as a reference for many potential practices and creative problem solving methodologies available to farmers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".