MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164723612 · doi:10.5589/m10-070

Quick Profiler (QuiP): a friendly tool to extract roughness statistical parameters using a needle profiler

2010· article· en· W2164723612 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Mélanie Trudel, François Charbonneau, Fernando Carlos Avendaño, Robert Leconte

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsGraphical user interfaceWind profilerRemote sensingComputer scienceRadarInterface (matter)Surface roughnessEngineeringEngineering drawingGeographyTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractQuiP is a graphical user interface (GUI) developed in MATLAB to extract and analyze soil surface profile measurements obtained from a needle profiler in a few minutes. Surface roughness parameters can be extracted from any needle profiler with simple modifications to the tool. QuiP calculates many statistics useful in radar remote sensing while generating the profiles. Furthermore, a QuiP function can be used to join several profiles. Long profiles can therefore be created from a short profiler (e.g., 1 m) that is easier to carry and handle in the field. Extraction of profiles by QuiP is repeatable and therefore reduces user's errors from data processing.QuiP est une interface graphique d'utilisation (GUI) développé sous MATLAB, qui permet d'extraire et d'analyser les profils de rugosité de surface de profilomètres à aiguilles en quelques minutes. De simples modifications au profilomètre permettent l'utilisation de QuiP et ainsi d'analyser les profils de manière efficaces. Des paramètres statistiques utilisés en télédétection radar sont automatiquement calculées par QuiP. De plus, QuiP permet de joindre plusieurs profils et ainsi de recréer des profils de plusieurs mètres en utilisant un profilomètre de plus petite taille (i.e., 1 m) qui est plus facile à manipuler et à transporter. La répétabilité de l'extraction avec QuiP est démontrée, ce qui réduit les erreurs liées à l'utilisateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207