Interfacial fracture analysis of underfill delamination and flip chip reliability optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A generalized plane strain condition was assumed for an edge interfacial crack between die passivation and underfill for an organic substrate flip chip package. C4 solder bumps are explicitly modeled. Temperature excursion is applied as loadmg condition. The design factors studied include underfill modulus, underfill coefficient of thermal expansioR CTE, fillet height and die overhang. Underfill modulus and CTE are functions of filler content. Varying underfill modulus and CTE produces a different stress field at underfilVdie passivation interface, different Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) and phase angle even under same loading condition. The baseline case uses underfill with elastic modulus of 6 GPa, CTE of 36 ppdT and fillet height equal to half die thickness. Four more cases involving underfill material properties are investigated by varying elastic modulus between 3 GPa and 9 GPa, and by varying CTE between 26 ppm/C and 46 ppd0C. Effect of fillet height is also studied by assuming no fillet and full fillet, i.e. fillet height equal to die thickness. Lastly, two cases concerning the influence of die overhang, defmed as the nominal distance between outmost solder joint and die edge, are investigated. The effects of these factors are evaluated on fracture parameters including energy release rate (G) and phase angle (v). Underfill material properties (elastic modulus and CTE), fillet configuration and die overhang can be optimized to reduce the risk of underfill delamination in flip chip or DCA applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".