Joint Rate Control and Resource Allocation in OFDMA Wireless Mesh Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors develop distributed algorithms for joint end-to-end rate control and resource (e.g., subcarrier, power) allocation in orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)-based wireless mesh networks. These algorithms allow spatial reuse where the same subcarrier can be used for simultaneous transmissions on different links as long as they weakly interfere with each other. The subcarrier allocation algorithm is based on routing information and a novel definition of interference sets and it aims at providing fair transmission rate among traffic flows in an end-to-end basis. The joint rate and power control is treated as a network utility maximization problem considering interference of simultaneous transmissions on the same subcarrier with node power constraint. The numerical results confirm the convergence of the joint rate and power control algorithm and show that fair end-to-end transmission is achieved. With the distributed radio resource management framework developed in this paper, a proper spatial reuse can be done to achieve good system throughput performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it