MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164774316 · doi:10.1109/asap.2014.6868630

Pipelined modular multiplier supporting multiple standard prime fields

2014· article· en· W2164774316 on OpenAlexaff
Hamad Alrimeih, Daler Rakhmatov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNISTMultiplier (economics)DatapathComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayPrime (order theory)CryptographyArithmeticElliptic curve cryptographyModular arithmeticModular designParallel computingComputer hardwarePublic-key cryptographyMathematicsAlgorithmProgramming languageEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computationally-intensive cryptographic applications are critically dependent on the efficiency of modular multiplications. It is desirable for a modular multiplier to offer not only high performance, but also a certain degree of flexibility, supporting multiplications over finite fields of varying size. We propose a fast and flexible modular multiplier over five prime fields GF(p), standardized by NIST for use in elliptic curve cryptography, where the five special primes p are of size 192, 224, 256, 384, and 521 bits. A prime-specific datapath configuration of our multiplier is established automatically, based on an external control word that identifies a NIST prime in use. The pipeline latency of our multiplier (implemented on a Virtex-6 FPGA and running at 100 MHz) is 80 ns for 192-bit, 224-bit, and 256-bit NIST primes, and 200 ns for 384-bit and 521-bit NIST primes. The main limitation of this work is that our multiplier currently supports only the NIST prime fields. We believe that such a limitation is justifiable, as the NIST prime fields are widely used in practice and enable performance improvements through specialized hardware optimizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207