MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164814795 · doi:10.1061/9780784412787.219

Partial Stabilization of an Active Slide Area Utilizing Soil Mixed Shear Keys installed Using Cutter Soil Mixing Results of a Test Section

2013· article· en· W2164814795 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brian Wilson, Emilie Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Congress 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryGeotechnical engineeringDirect shear testShear (geology)Soil stabilizationCivil engineeringSection (typography)GeologySoil cementEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringEngineeringSoil waterComputer scienceSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fountain Slide is located on Highway 99, British Colombia, Canada, approximately 17 km east of the town of Lillooet. The slide, which incorporates about 750,000 m3 of material, is part of an ancient earth flow which has been active for decades, with recorded movements between 2006 and 2009 of in the order of 4 m. As a result of the large movement, the British Colombia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure converted approximately 300 m of the paved road surface to gravel so that it could be better maintained, and commenced investigation of suitable alternatives to mitigate on-going movement. Following their assessment of the engineering parameters of the slide, and a review of potential stabilization options, the Ministry elected to design and install a test stabilization section comprising a series of soil-cement shear keys installed using Cutter Soil Mixing. This paper presents background data on the slide, an overview of the conceptual design rationale used in the selection of parameters for the test section, the challenges and experiences gained during installation of the test shear keys, as well as the results of both the monitoring of the slope and the short and longer-term strength data accumulated for the soil-cement shear keys from both wet-grab and cored sampling programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeo-Congress 2013Same topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207