MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164914547 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs421

Natural history of discrete subaortic stenosisin adults: a multicentre study

2012· article· en· W2164914547 on OpenAlexaff
Denise van der Linde, Johanna J.M. Takkenberg, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Helena J. Heuvelman, Werner Budts, Arie P.J. van Dijk, Maarten Witsenburg, Sing‐Chien Yap, Ad J.J.C. Bogers, Candice K. Silversides, Erwin Oechslin, J. W. Roos-Hesselink

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersErasmus+Radboud Universiteit
KeywordsMedicineNatural historyHazard ratioInternal medicineCardiologyVentricular outflow tractRetrospective cohort studyCohortProportional hazards modelConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is often diagnosed early in life and known for its sometimes rapid haemodynamic progression in childhood and strong association with aortic regurgitation (AR). However, data about the evolution of DSS in adulthood are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the natural history of DSS, and identify risk factors for the progression of DSS, AR, and intervention-free survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Conservatively managed adult DSS patients were included in this retrospective multicentre cohort study. Mixed-effects and joint models were used to assess the progression of DSS and AR, and intervention-free survival. Longitudinal natural history data were available for 149 patients [age 20 (IQR: 18-34) years, 48% male]. Sixty patients (40.3%) had associated congenital heart defects (CHDs). The median follow-up duration was 6.3 (IQR: 3.0-12.4) years. The baseline peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient was 32.3 ± 17.0 mmHg and increased by 0.8 ± 0.1 mmHg/year. While the baseline LVOT gradient (P = 0.891) or age (P = 0.421) did not influence the progression rate, the presence of associated CHD was associated with faster progression (P = 0.005). Mild AR was common (58%), but did not significantly progress over time (P = 0.701). The median intervention-free survival was 16 years and associated with the baseline LVOT gradient [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.9 (95% CI: 2.0-7.6)], DSS progression [HR = 2.6 (95% CI: 2.0-3.5)], and AR [HR = 6.4 (95% CI 2.6-15.6)]. CONCLUSION: In contrast to children, DSS progresses slowly in adulthood. In particular, patients with associated CHD are at risk for faster progression and should be monitored cautiously. Discrete subaortic stenosis progression is not influenced by the baseline LVOT gradient or age. Mild AR is common, but non-progressive over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207