TPI ASM8 reduces eosinophil progenitors in sputum after allergen challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: TPI ASM8 contains two modified phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides (AON), one targeting the common beta chain (βc) of the IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSF receptors and the other targeting the chemokine receptor CCR3. Inhalation of TPI ASM8 significantly improves lung function and sputum eosinophilia after allergen inhalation challenge in asthmatics. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed whether TPI ASM8 reduces airway levels of haemopoietic progenitor cells. METHODS: This open-label study was conducted in 14 stable, allergic mild asthmatic subjects with early- and late-phase allergen-induced bronchoconstriction. Subjects underwent allergen challenges after 4-day treatment with placebo, 4 mg b.i.d. and 8 mg o.d. of TPI ASM8. Sputum was induced before, 7 and 24 h after allergen challenges for progenitor measurements. Treatments were separated by 2-3 weeks. RESULTS: TPI ASM8 reduced allergen-induced sputum eosinophils, and the early and late asthmatic responses (P<0.05). TPI ASM8 also reduced the number of CD34(+) CCR3(+) cells (P=0.004) and CD34(+) IL-5Rα(+) cells (P=0.016), and the proportion of CD34(+) cells expressing IL-5Rα (P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TPI ASM8 was safe and well tolerated. The results of this study demonstrate blocking of CCR3 and βc expression by TPI ASM8 significantly inhibits the accumulation of eosinophils and eosinophil progenitors in the airways after allergen challenge. Inhibition of airway progenitor cell accumulation presents a novel therapeutic target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".