Increased expression of CD55 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the expression of complement delay-accelerating factor (CD55) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathologic features, including survival rate. METHODS: Eighty-two nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues were evaluated for CD55 expression using immunohistochemistry. The association between CD55 expression and various clinicopathological characteristics including overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the protein expression of CD55 detected in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues was higher than that in the normal nasopharyngeal tissue (P=0.003). In addition, high levels of CD55 protein were positively correlated with the status of lymph node metastasis (P=0.02) and distant metastasis (P=0.01), and clinical stage (P=0.002) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Patients with positive CD55 expression had a significantly shorter overall survival time than did patients with negative CD55 expression (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested that the expression pattern of CD55 protein was an independent prognostic indicator (P=0.009) for the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The data from this study suggest, for the first time, that CD55 is frequently expressed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its expression is associated with decreased patient survival; therefore, CD55 expression may be a potential unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".