MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Vivo Resistance of Coronally Induced Bacterial Ingress by an Experimental Glass Ionomer Cement Root Canal Sealer

2000· article· en· W2165046587 on OpenAlexaff
Sonia Friedman, R KOMOROWSKI, Wayne A. Maillet, R. Klimaite, STOMAT, H NGUYEN, C TORNECK

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endodontics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeagleDentistryRoot canalPulp (tooth)InoculationCementGlass ionomer cementMedicineMaterials scienceComposite materialPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The resistance of an experimental sealer (KT-308) to bacterial ingress was assessed in six beagle dogs. In four mandibular premolars per dog, canals were prepared, filled with condensed gutta-percha and either KT-308 or Roth 801 cement (n = 24 roots), and the pulp chambers inoculated with plaque. Two additional premolars per dog were similarly root-filled, but not inoculated (n = 12 and 11, respectively). One incisor per dog was inoculated, but not root-filled (n = 6). Dogs were terminated after 6 months, and jaw blocks were retrieved and processed for light microscopic examination of the periapical tissues. Inflammation about the inoculated roots was significantly lower (p < 0.03) for KT-308 (17%) than Roth 801 cement (46%). Inflammation about the noninoculated roots did not differ significantly between KT-308 (8%) and Roth 801 cement (36%). This study demonstrated a better functional efficacy of KT-308 than of Roth 801 cement, and validated this in vivo model for assessment of root filling materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EndodonticsSame topicEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207