MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165056223 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12866

Stillbirth in twins, exploring the optimal gestational age for delivery: a retrospective cohort study

2014· article· en· W2165056223 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen Wood, Selphee Tang, Sue Ross, Reg Sauvé

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyGestational ageObstetricsMedicineCohortPregnancyDemographySociologySurgeryBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal gestational age at delivery for twins. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Database containing demographic, delivery, and pregnancy outcome data for over 600,000 births from 81 hospitals in Alberta, Canada. POPULATION: All twin births in Alberta, Canada, during 1992-2007, as recorded in the databases of the Alberta Perinatal Health Project (www.aphp.ca). METHODS: The case files were reviewed for cause of death and any information regarding the gestational age at diagnosis of stillbirth. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of potentially confounding factors. The 'fetus at risk' approach was used to evaluate the prospective risk of stillbirth. Competing risks of stillbirth and neonatal death were evaluated with a perinatal risk ratio. RESULTS: Of a total of 17,724 twin births there were 236 antepartum stillbirths, 26 intrapartum stillbirths, and 244 neonatal deaths. The rate of stillbirth peaked at 7.0/1000 fetuses at risk at 38 weeks of gestation. On multivariate analysis, small for gestational age (odds ratio, OR 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.35-3.59), birthweight discrepancy >20% (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.42-5.03), and an interaction between these two variables (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.31-6.59), were significant. The perinatal risk ratio suggested that the risks of delivery and expectant management were balanced at 36 weeks of gestation (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.1-5.4), but the confidence interval included one, the null value, until 38 weeks of gestation (RR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02-0.40). The majority of stillbirths at term (14/25) occurred in monochorionic diamniotic twins. The estimated risk of stillbirth in this group was 2.3/1000 fetuses at risk at 37 weeks of gestation, and 17.4/1000 fetuses at risk at 38 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: The balance of risk between neonatal death/intrapartum stillbirth and antepartum stillbirth begins to favour delivery at 36 weeks of gestation, particularly in monochorionic diamniotic twins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207