Relationships between the demography and distribution of two bird‐dispersed plants in an island archipelago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aim I evaluated relationships between the demography and distribution of two bird‐dispersed shrubs in an island archipelago to better understand the life history precursors of different island distributional patterns. Location Barkley Sound, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada (48°80′ N, 125°20′ W). Methods The abundance and occurrence of Lonicera involucrata Rich. (Caprifoliaceae) and Ribes divaricatum Dougl. (Grossulariaceae) were measured on 69 islands measuring between 25 and 800 m 2 . Light and soil conditions were quantified to broadly characterize changes in environmental conditions with island area and isolation. Several experiments and field observations were conducted to evaluate the life history response of each species to changes in island environments. Results Lonicera showed a typical island distribution; it increased in abundance and occurrence with island area. Ribes had a more unusual distributional pattern; it showed no differences in occurrence or abundance with island area. The distribution of both species was unrelated to island isolation. Small islands had less soil and more light than large islands, while environmental conditions were unrelated to island isolation. Lonicera had higher seed germination rates and adult survivorship in large island environments, but similar rates of seed dispersal, seedling survivorship and sapling survivorship in large and small island environments. Ribes had similar rates of seed dispersal, germination and adult survivorship in large and small island environments. However, slightly higher seedling survivorship in large island environments was offset by decreased sapling survivorship. Conclusions Demographic advantages accrued at particular life history stages were either enhanced ( Lonicera ) or erased ( Ribes ) at other life history stages. Nevertheless, overall life history trends were consistent with distributional patterns, and suggest different suites of life history characteristics promote different island distributions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".