Cochannel interference mitigation using whitening receiver designs in bandlimited microcellular wireless systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of cochannel interference (CCI) suppression using a noise-plus-interference whitening matched filter (WMF) is addressed. Binary phase-shift keying modulated transmission over a Nakagami-m fading channel is considered in a bandlimited microcellular wireless system. It is shown that the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) of the WMF can not exceed that of the conventional matched filter (CMF) receiver for synchronous CCI, but in the asynchronous channel, CCI whitening can be used to improve receiver performance. The SINR-maximizing filter (SINRMF) in an asynchronous channel is derived and shown to be composed of a WMF followed by a discrete time filter. The SINRs of the WMF and SINRMF receivers are analytically evaluated for a standard raised-cosine (RC) and a Beaulieu-Tan-Damen pulse. It is shown that for the RC pulse, the WMF can achieve a SINR gain as large as 1.76 dB over the CMF receiver provided that the transmission is free of intersymbol interference (ISI). The SINR of the ISI-impaired system is also evaluated and the conditions under which this system can achieve close to ISI-free SINR are studied. The SINR is evaluated for the SINRMF and it is shown that this filter can restore much of the SINR loss incurred due to ISI introduced by the WMF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".