MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165179488 · doi:10.47197/retos.v0i28.34953

Promoting Physical Activity Among Adolescents: Recommendations From Correlation Research (La promoción de la actividad físicas entre los adolescentes: recomendaciones a partir de la investigación correlacional)

2015· article· en· W2165179488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRetos · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhysical activityMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Adolescents are not meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines for health and, although there has been much PA intervention research for this age group, most studies have had only a small effect on teens’ PA. Many have observed that teenagers’ PA is determined by a complex array of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and family, school, and community environmental factors. We sought to update previous reviews of correlates of adolescent PA, focusing exclusively on modifiable correlates of adolescents’ PA to suggest avenues for PA promotion intervention design. Based on our findings from twenty studies exploring correlates among international samples of adolescents, we suggest that parent and peer PA and support of adolescents’ PA are important influencing factors to consider when designing PA promotion interventions for teenagers. Moreover, limited work suggests the potential importance of physical environment modifications.Resumen. Los adolescentes no están cumpliendo con las recomendaciones de actividad física (AF) para la salud y, aunque ha habido mucha investigación en la intervención de AF para este grupo de edad, la mayoría de los estudios han tenido sólo un pequeño efecto sobre la AF de los adolescentes. Muchos han observado que la AF de los adolescentes está determinada por una compleja serie de factores intrapersonales, interpersonales, del contexto familiar y escolar y de la comunidad. Hemos tratado de actualizar las revisiones previas de los correlatos de la AF en los adolescentes, centrándonos exclusivamente en los correlatos modificables de AF de los adolescentes para sugerir ideas en el diseño de intervenciones de promoción de la AF. En base a los resultados de veinte estudios que exploraron las correlaciones entre muestras internacionales de adolescentes, se sugiere que la AF de los padres y los compañeros y el apoyo de ambos a la AF de los adolescentes son factores de influencia importantes a considerar en el diseño de intervenciones de promoción de la AF para los adolescentes. Por otra parte, algunas investigaciones sugieren la importancia potencial de modificaciones en el entorno físico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it