Promoting Physical Activity Among Adolescents: Recommendations From Correlation Research (La promoción de la actividad físicas entre los adolescentes: recomendaciones a partir de la investigación correlacional)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Adolescents are not meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines for health and, although there has been much PA intervention research for this age group, most studies have had only a small effect on teens’ PA. Many have observed that teenagers’ PA is determined by a complex array of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and family, school, and community environmental factors. We sought to update previous reviews of correlates of adolescent PA, focusing exclusively on modifiable correlates of adolescents’ PA to suggest avenues for PA promotion intervention design. Based on our findings from twenty studies exploring correlates among international samples of adolescents, we suggest that parent and peer PA and support of adolescents’ PA are important influencing factors to consider when designing PA promotion interventions for teenagers. Moreover, limited work suggests the potential importance of physical environment modifications.Resumen. Los adolescentes no están cumpliendo con las recomendaciones de actividad física (AF) para la salud y, aunque ha habido mucha investigación en la intervención de AF para este grupo de edad, la mayoría de los estudios han tenido sólo un pequeño efecto sobre la AF de los adolescentes. Muchos han observado que la AF de los adolescentes está determinada por una compleja serie de factores intrapersonales, interpersonales, del contexto familiar y escolar y de la comunidad. Hemos tratado de actualizar las revisiones previas de los correlatos de la AF en los adolescentes, centrándonos exclusivamente en los correlatos modificables de AF de los adolescentes para sugerir ideas en el diseño de intervenciones de promoción de la AF. En base a los resultados de veinte estudios que exploraron las correlaciones entre muestras internacionales de adolescentes, se sugiere que la AF de los padres y los compañeros y el apoyo de ambos a la AF de los adolescentes son factores de influencia importantes a considerar en el diseño de intervenciones de promoción de la AF para los adolescentes. Por otra parte, algunas investigaciones sugieren la importancia potencial de modificaciones en el entorno físico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.124 | 0.122 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".