Archive Fever as Genealogical Fever: Coming Home to Scottish Archives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le genre d' archivation 1 qui est produite par les historiens de la famille.Dans ce processus, la fonction et le sens des archives en cosse voluent, et ce texte offre un examen de cette transformation.D'abord, il donne un aperu de la faon dont l'histoire de la famille s'est developpe avec le temps, en traant sa relation avec l'histoire des archives cossaises.Ensuite, l'article examine plusieurs thmes relis l'histoire de la famille et au tourisme.Ceux-ci incluent un examen de la diaspora cossaise et de l'ide du retour chez-soi; une comparaison de la faon dont le concept de l'authenticit est appliqu dans l'industrie du tourisme et aux archives; et enfin, une discussion du rle des archives dans la construction de l'identit.ABSTRACT This article explores the kind of "archivization" 2 that is produced by family historians.Within this process, the function and meaning of archives in Scotland is changing and here is offered an examination of this transformation.Firstly, an overview of how family history has developed over time and its relation to the history of Scottish archives is provided.Secondly, the article investigates several themes within family history and tourism.These include an exploration of the Scottish diaspora and the idea of homecoming; a comparison of how the concept of authentici ty is used within the tourist industry and archives; and finally a discussion on the role that archives play in the construction of identity.* I would like to thank the students and staff of HATII at the University of Glasgow, and Michael Moss, Susan Tucker, and Ronald Lambert for their help, comments and encourage
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it